PSYCHOLOGICAL RESILIENCE AND COPING IN HIGH-RESPONSIBILITY PROFESSIONS: INSIGHTS FROM AVIATION PILOTS OF PAKISTAN
Keywords:
psychological resilience, coping strategies, aviation psychology, occupational stress, pilots, mental health, high-responsibility professions.Abstract
The present study aimed to explore the relationship between psychological resilience and coping strategies among aviation pilots, a population characterized by high responsibility, occupational stress, and exposure to critical decision-making environments. The objective was to examine how resilience serves as a buffer against psychological distress and to identify coping mechanisms that promote optimal mental health in aviation professionals. Grounded in resilience and stress-coping theories, the study employed a quantitative, cross-sectional design with a sample of 200 licensed commercial and military pilots from major aviation sectors in Pakistan. Data were collected using standardized instruments including the Connor–Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC) and the Brief COPE Inventory, followed by statistical analyses using correlation and multiple regression techniques. Results indicated a significant positive association between resilience and adaptive coping strategies, particularly problem-focused coping, and a negative correlation with maladaptive coping mechanisms such as avoidance and substance use. Higher resilience scores predicted lower levels of perceived stress, anxiety, and burnout, suggesting that resilience functions as a critical psychological resource in high-responsibility professions. The findings align with previous literature on resilience and occupational stress but extend knowledge by emphasizing the unique context of aviation psychology. Limitations include reliance on self-report measures and a cross-sectional design that restricts causal inference. Future research should employ longitudinal and intervention-based methods to further explore resilience enhancement programs in aviation contexts.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Contemporary Journal of Social Science Review

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
