REFRAMING JUSTICE AND GENDER INEQUALITY: A CRITICAL DISCOURSE ANALYSIS OF COURTROOM NARRATIVES IN PINK (2016) AS COUNTER DISCOURSE

Abstract

The study analyses the courtroom narrative in the film Pink (2016), which centres on a woman's right to autonomy over her sexuality. The study critically examines this discourse to explore real-world implications. Using van Dijk’s social cognition theory (Dijk, 1993, p. 257) within the Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) framework, the researchers illustrate how certain ideologies and beliefs are socially constructed. Additionally, they explore how social cognitions influence communication and other forms of action and interaction. His critical analysis of the narratives reveals how the dominant group reproduces discourse to exert power and influence decisions that contribute to social inequality, particularly gender inequality. The focus is on the structures embedded in discourse that reflect public perceptions of women’s character and sexuality. The study illustrates how societal views (social cognition) play a significant role in shaping women’s identities, whether portrayed positively or negatively. The issue of gender inequality presented in Pink is relevant to Pakistani society, reflecting similarities in gender dynamics between India and Pakistan, as both nations contend with patriarchal systems, gender-based violence, and the challenges faced by women.  The study implies a need for greater awareness of gender equality and encourages critical reflections on media portrayals of women while advocating for policy reforms to address gender-based inequalities.