SOFTWARE AUTOMATION TESTING: COMPARING NO-CODE, LOW-CODE, AND TRADITIONAL APPROACHES (2025)

Abstract

Automated software testing tools play a vital  part in guaranteeing the  trustability, effectiveness, and quality of software  operations. As the lifecycles of software development grow more intricate, the demand for effective  robotization testing has risen  vastly. This paper offers a  relative evaluation of low- code, no-  code, and traditional  automation testing tools, assessing them grounded on essential criteria  similar as customization,  client support,  user-friendliness, and integration capabilities..

Furthermore, it explores the advantages and limitations of each tool category, providing a comprehensive guide for new testers to select the most appropriate automation technique based on their skill level and project requirements. The findings indicate that no-code tools offer accessibility for non-technical testers, low-code tools balance ease of use with moderate customization, and traditional tools provide maximum flexibility and scalability for experienced testers handling complex projects. By understanding the strengths and weaknesses of each category, testers and organizations can make informed decisions to optimize their software testing strategies [2].